Tag Archives: China

‘Soft power’ and storytelling in India, China

Click here to read Kavita Ramdya’s article “‘Soft power’ and storytelling in India, China” in the 29 January 2010 edition of “News India Times”.



“‘Soft power’ and storytelling in India, China” by Kavita Ramdya in “News India Times” (29 January 2010)

Shashi Tharoor, a Keralite writer and former member of the UN, has recently come under the gun by colleagues in Indian parliament for his frequent use of Twitter as a vehicle to candidly and regularly express his views on political matters. India, although the largest democracy in the world, does not mean its politicians are the most communicative. Instead, Mr. Tharoor’s attitude towards using social networking sites and openly conveying his thoughts on matters such as whether India should tighten its visa requirements in the name of preventing terrorism has incited a wave of disapproval among his colleagues who admonish his very public disagreement with senior members of Parliament.

Respecting one’s elders and superiors remains a relevant value in Indian society. What makes Mr. Tharoor’s dilemma more interesting is his use of Twitter, a one-way form of communication via the Internet, to broadcast his thoughts to his half-a-million followers. Clearly, Twitter serves as a significant vehicle for communicating his political ideas, but what of his and fellow intellectuals’ cultural concepts?

In the 2009 TED (Technology Entertainment Design) India Conference which took place in Mysore, Mr. Tharoor proposed that nations pursue a policy of “soft power” versus traditional methods of asserting control such as politics and trade. “Soft” power, originally coined by Harvard scholar Joseph Nye, is defined by the ability to spread culture – in India’s case, more specifically, it means exporting Bollywood movies, offering curries and dhosas in English towns, and performing the tabla in Europe’s greatest concert halls. Ultimately, Tharoor suggests that what will make a country more powerful is its ability to embed itself in people’s minds the world over via cultural exports.

Elucidating concepts from his book “The Elephant, The Tiger, And the Cell Phone: Reflections on India – the Emerging 21st-Century Power”, Mr. Tharoor goes on to argue that “the entire notion of world leadership seems to me archaic”. In a historical moment where the concept of BRIC ascendancy (Brazil Russia India China) is so widely accepted that it informs investment banks’ directions for growth and expansion in the global markets, Mr. Tharoor takes a risky stance by downplaying the role India is expected to have in the global markets. He argues that the country’s military strength (India has the 4th-largest army in the world), its population (India’s will exceed China’s by 2034), and economic growth (while other world economies have recently shrunk due to the global economic crisis, India’s grew 6.7% in 2008) will be overshadowed by India’s contribution to the world by India’s culture, its soft power.

Some obvious examples of soft power, or a country’s ability to attract others via culture, political values and foreign policies, include China’s Beijing Olympics and America’s Fulbright Scholarships. However, Tharoor suggests that MTV and McDonalds have done more for promoting American culture and values than anything the U.S. government may orchestrate: soft power spreads because of and in spite of governments’ actions.

Although official news outlets such as print media, radio and television have traditionally been the source for news about the world, social networking sites such as Facebook, MySpace and Twitter informs people globally about countries, including stories governments might not want to spread.  This notion of “soft power” which has gained credibility the world over is critical in understanding the current face-off between Google and China. Whereas originally Google agreed to censor its China-based search engine, cyber attacks on Google mail accounts held by human rights activists have incited Google to cease censoring its sites while engaging in talks with the Chinese government with regards to the incidences of hacking.

Censorship is anti-democratic and, in the current world we live in, impractical in terms of limiting the spread of information and managing a country’s global public image. Information will always find a way out. That said, the current example of China and Google is useful in terms of discussing public image and publicity since, rightly so, “soft power” is emerging as a widely-accepted tool in wielding power globally.

In the case of China, if the country that “tells the better story prevails”, then it should come as no surprise why the Chinese government takes pains to control and consolidate outgoing narratives about its political workings, people and products. Of course, China’s struggle for control of its image is a losing battle; the prevailing western notions of open society and democratic values have been exported, sold and embraced globally and, via technologies offered in the current information era, will win over government propaganda.

Mr. Tharoor concludes his TED presentation about soft power by asserting that what makes India different, helpful in understanding the current conflict between Google and China, is the agreement “on ground rules of how you will disagree”, a sunny image for India where territorial conflict in Kashmir is still handled by the military and terrorism is still a concern one year after the November 26th Mumbai attacks by terrorists. And, despite the proliferation of Indian restaurants and yoga studios globally, screenings of Bollywood films in European capitals, and Ravi Shankar’s ability to sell-out shows when he performs at Carnegie Hall, media about India is still often focused on dire stories about honor killings and economic migrants.

However, Mr. Tharoor’s point that countries agree on how to disagree is a useful one: something for economists and capitalists to contemplate when pondering the potential BRIC countries have to offer in the global markets is the BRIC countries’ own commitment to establishing and maintaining an “open society”. Now we see the reality of western companies’ inability to compromise values in exchange for financial returns. In a world where soft power has emerged as a widely-accepted instrument for power, politicians and corporate titans alike need to contemplate what the BRIC countries’ stories tell us about them.

Kavita Ramdya is author of “Bollywood Weddings: Dating, Engagement and Marriage in Hindu America”. www.bollywood-weddings.com

Leave a comment

Filed under Current Events

“Risky Business: How Ha Jin is becoming an American writer” by Kavita Ramdya

While a Ph.D. student at Boston University, I had the opportunity to interview Ha Jin for a profile which was later published in the alumni magazine. Dr. Jin gave me two pieces of advice that significantly influenced choices I’ve made in my writing. The first piece of advice he gave me was to write about Asian America in my Doctorate dissertation, what later became the foundation of my book “Bollywood Weddings: Dating, Engagement and Marriage in Hindu America”.

Click here to read my profile of Ha Jin, entitled “Risky Business: How Ha Jin is becoming an American writer”.



Boston University’s “Arts & Sciences” – Summer 2004, Number 14

“Risky Business: How Ha Jin is becoming an American writer” by Kavita Ramdya

On an unseasonably warm April morning, Xuefei Jin (GRS’94), better known by the pen name Ha Jin, relaxes in the shade on a bench facing the Charles River. The morning is quiet and serene, and so is Jin. His manner is understated and calm; a casual acquaintance might have trouble believing that he is the author of the bleak and irony-filled novel Waiting, which won the 1999 National Book Award. His demeanor suggests little of the tumultuous path that brought him from China to America and Boston University, nor of the risks he has taken, as both a writer and a human being, to get here.

Jin has been a professor in the Graduate School’s Creative Writing Program since September 2002. He is an enviously prolific author, publishing a book of prose or poetry every one to two years, most recently The Crazed (2002). Known for his stinging criticisms of the Chinese government in the wake of the student-massacre at Tiananmen Square in 1989, writes solely in English, a language he didn’t learn until he was in his twenties-partly in protest of Chinese government censorship.

Born in 1956 and raised mostly in a small rural town in Liaoning Province, Jin came of age just as China was entering the Cultural Revolution, and that era serves as a backdrop for many of his works. Jin recalls his mother being denounced for belonging to the “enemy class,” since her father was a landowner. Accused as a dissident, she was made to pick up trash and was later moved to the countryside to pick apples. Jin’s father, an officer in the People’s Liberation Army, was sent to a neighboring city to further the revolution. “The Cultural Revolution divided many families,” Jin says.

He joined the army at age 13, serving on the tense border between China and the Soviet Union, at a time when the two countries were near war. He served for six years, and his experiences fueled much of his later writing. Despite hardship, he says that “being in the army provided me with a mentally and emotionally clear and stable life. There was no imagination involved. In the army your enemy is clear, and you know how to fight him. It is such a formulated life.”

Jin describes himself as “half-illiterate” before he joined the army, not knowing enough Chinese characters to read a book, but full of instinctual desire to learn. He spent his army years teaching himself to read and write in his native language, despite the prevailing antipathy toward “bourgeois” activities. Ironically, once he knew how to write, he was frequently asked to compose propaganda for the regime his literature would later critique.

After leaving the army at 19, Jin worked as a telegraph operator for the Harbin Railroad Company, competing with 20,000 other railroad workers for a place in Heilongjiang University in Harbin. He was the only employee admitted, and although he was assigned to study English literature-his last choice for a major-he embraced the opportunity. He knew that most students accepted to university were admitted to technical or two-year colleges.

He earned a B.A. in English in 1981 and then an M.A. in American literature at Shandong University, where he met his wife, Lisha Bein. In 1985 he moved to the United States on a scholarship from Brandeis University to work on his Ph.D. in English. It was normal for the Chinese government to fragment families to try to curb immigration, so Jin’s wife wasn’t permitted to leave the country until two years later. The couple’s son, Wen, stayed in China for two more years. When the massacre at Tiananmen Square occurred in 1989, “I thought China was closing its doors, so we were desperate to get [Wen] here.” They were prepared to bribe officials, but that proved unnecessary; in the disarray of post-Tiananmen Square China, government workers efficiently processed Jin’s visa request for Wen. Jin speaks often of his aspiration that Wen be “an American boy,” spared the bureaucratic cruelties and the suffering detailed in his novels.

Tiananmen Square clinched his decision to remain in America with his family. As a self-styled exile, he communicates no remorse about his decision. The decision to write solely in English was in some ways more difficult. Without a Chinese audience, he was both cornered and challenged into that choice. It is just one of many adjustments he has made as a writer-and citizen-in America. “Here you are free to have to take care of yourself,” he says. “In many ways life is a fight. There are so many uncertainties. When I decided to stay in America, I had to learn to live with uncertainties. That was something I wasn’t used to in China.”

Jin’s first English-language book, the poetry collection Between Silences, was written during the summer of 1988 while he was working full time in a cloth factory in Watertown, Massachusetts. Asked how he managed to write and publish a book of poetry while pursuing graduate studies and working long hours, Jin says it had more to do with releasing tension than with serious aspirations toward a writing career. “I was not an American man to do with my life what I wanted. I was repressed in China. Rationally, I couldn’t afford to be a poet or fiction writer, so I turned to academia for my livelihood. I had to let it out that summer because I would be unstable if I didn’t.”

Jin recalls that his academic advisor at Brandeis, Professor Allen Grossman, told him that his creative writing must come first always. Grossman, who now teaches poetry at Johns Hopkins University, was struck by the way Jin’s Chinese vernacular blended with his non-native English to create what Grossman calls “a floating language,” an exceptionally non-native idiom, “floating between his native language and English:’ As a teacher, Grossman says, “this floating language was so interesting that you didn’t want to do anything about it.”

The poet Frank Bidart, Jin’s instructor at Brandeis, echoes that sentiment. He recalls reading the first poem Jin submitted to his workshop: “It was a remarkable experience to have someone turn in a poem at the end of the first class that I thought was astonishing. The poem was entirely there, and I had nothing tondo with it.” Bidart immediately called his editor and friend Jonathan Galassi at The Paris Review and recited the poem over the phone. The conversation concluded with Galassi agreeing to publish the poem.

Jin expanded his team of writing mentors to include the novelist Leslie Epstein, director of BU’s Creative Writing Program. Jin audited one of Epstein’s classes, and Epstein says he knew within the first two weeks that Jin was a genius: “If any proof were needed, it was someone struggling to come to grips with the language, then managing to write a beautiful book like Ocean of Words,” a collection of army stories dedicated to Epstein for which Jin later won the PEN/Hemingway Award.

After auditing more classes while he improved his English, Jin enrolled full time in the Creative Writing Program, and when he finished his degree, he had written every story in Under the Red Flag, a collection that won him the 1997 Flannery O’Connor Award for Short Fiction. He landed a job teaching poetry, fiction, and literature at Emory University in Atlanta in 1993. He spent a happy and productive near-decade there before he was lured back to BU as a full professor in the program that he’d once audited.

The decision to write solely in English, Jin says, is seen as traitorous by some in China. He hopes his work will someday find a place in Chinese literature, but he defends his refusal to return to the country. “With China there are so many interferences; you can’t do anything. They edit out paragraphs and pages. Living as a writer in China means endless heartbreaks and heartache.” Jin’s parents and five siblings, still in China, are unaware of the extent of his success as a writer in America.

Jin became a naturalized U.S. citizen in 1997, but he does not consider himself a “hyphenated” Asian-American writer, since he has not yet published a work about America. His next novel, due to be released this fall, is War Trash (Pantheon), about Chinese prisoners held during the Korean War. The work contains Chinese-American characters, and he thinks it will function as a transition to a future book, one that is set in his new homeland, America.


1 Comment

Filed under Literature